Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Serbian parliamentary opposition leaders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

List of Serbian parliamentary opposition leaders

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I never heard about a position called "parliamentary opposition leader" in Serbia. In Serbian parliament, opposition is always consisted of several parties, usually not in good relations to each other. So, there is never one leader of the opposition, but several leaders. This article claims that the leader of the largest oppositional party is the unofficial "Leader of the Opposition", but there is no reliable source to prove that such (unofficial) position exists. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  02:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete For one thing a person or party is only in the opposition when someone else is in power, so not a defining characteristic. Borock (talk) 06:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. See also Articles for deletion/Leader of the Opposition (Sweden), deleted for similar reasons. Actually, the whole list at Leader of the Opposition requires an overhaul by someone in the know: the title is usually applicable only to countries with strong two-party tradition. No such user (talk) 08:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - No Such User is on the mark. This falsely projects a two-party system onto multi-party parliamentary systems. Carrite (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.