Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sigma Tau Gamma National Meetings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

List of Sigma Tau Gamma National Meetings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This list seems to be a trivial listing of non-notable events outside of the organization; the meetings of the organization do not seem to receive significant coverage from entities not affiliated with the chapters. The only sources provided are from the organization. If these type articles were the norm, we'd have them for student organizations like the National FFA Organization or professional organizations like the IEEE which I don't believe are suitable for inclusion either. only (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete on the merits. There isn't anything notable about these meetings in and of themselves that would justify an article. Even if this were a fork from Sigma Tau Gamma, I would argue that the entire list isn't worth inclusion. Maybe substitute prose, such as "The fraternity began holding national meetings in 1925, and annually thereafter, before shifting to the current biennial schedule in 1946. These meetings alternate with leadership conferences held in off years." Then cite the references. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete An encyclopedia is not a fraternity planning agenda, this is of no value or interest outside the organization, and is not supported by reliable sources showing its significance. ValarianB (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. These biennial meetings are not notable and I don't see how a list of every single meeting can be notable either. Ajf773 (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons already mentioned. There's nothing there worth keeping. Marianna251TALK 10:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT: this is a list of indiscriminate information. - GretLomborg (talk) 20:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per points made by nom and other editors.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.