Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Singapore sexual slang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete the article. Mailer Diablo 15:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

List of Singapore sexual slang

 * Singapore sexual slang was nominated for deletion on 2005-05-25. For the prior discussion, see Articles for deletion/Singapore sexual slang.
 * Delete per explicit wikipedia policy: What Wikipedia is not, items ...is not  "Lists of such definitions" and "A usage guide or slang and idiom guide". Create an article Singapore sexual slang from the encyclopedic part of the page. Mukadderat 19:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Done and incoporatedRaveenS 14:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep It was originally named Singapore sexual slang before someone changed the title to List of Singapore sexual slang. It was already decided in 2005 not to delete it. Thus, this is a redundant discussion. It should be retained.Groyn88 13:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Travislangley 21:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg 23:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions.  Kimchi.sg 23:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep RaveenS 17:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep This has been resolved before, do not deleteKongan 17:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Huracane 14:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * See withdrawl o delecte for Gay slangs due to thea rbitary nature of delete requests and may be prejudicial. Collective decion is needed, leaving Gay slangs and removing Singapore sexula slang will demonstrate this prejudicial and bias in these nominations. I stronglu rge that this nomination be withdrawn like the gay slang nominationHuracane 22:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Interesting. Attic Owl 14:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. `'mikka (t) 17:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 22:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Interesting material, and has more info than just a list. Putting each term individually into a dictionalry would be unhelpful compared to having a collection of the terms from several languages used in one place. "Tiger Show" from "Thai Girl Show!"Edison 03:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good article on subject of universal importance. Part of what makes wikipedia a global reference work unlike any other. Does not violate WP:NOT, but could use work on references. --JJay 00:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Wikipedia keeps lists like this as stated above. Orangehead 17:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.