Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spanish words of Nahuatl origin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

List of Spanish words of Nahuatl origin
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ehrmagerd, werds! Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Pepper Beast   (talk)  13:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Lists,  and Mexico.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hm, I think this one could be merged into Nahuatlismo. At least some list would be OK to have there. //Replayful (talk &#124; contribs) 18:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep intro is not a dictionary and lists is probably fine? User:Sawerchessread (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep I’m not comfortable with so much material with no inline citations but I’m assuming most or all of the article content is potentially sourceable and the topic could be expanded. Doesn’t feel like TNT territory to me. Mccapra (talk) 09:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia has many lists like these and I don't see an issue with them, sure maybe it would be preferable that they be transformed into regular articles with more prose, but I don't think deletion is the solution here. The only real issue here is, as Mccapra pointed out, the lack of citations.★Trekker (talk) 02:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.