Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Destroyers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete&mdash;list of in-universe concepts that shows no real-world importance. Some of this information could be merged into other articles, so the list will be userfied. If and when the information is merged, the article will be restored as a redirect to Star Destroyer. &mdash; Deckiller 14:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

List of Star Destroyers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

expired uncontested prod, but these fiction articles tend toward the controversial so afd not prod is the way to go: the prod was based on "No assertion of real-world notability; article is entirely a jumble of trivia-laden in-universe plot summary" with which I don't disagree; also WP:FICT applies that this should be merged into whatever fictoverse it seeped out of. Carlossuarez46 22:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Star Destroyer. Nyttend 23:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  23:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete article and oppose merge to Star Destroyer. None of the content in this List of... asserts real-world impact or notability. Star Destroyer has recently been cleared of lots of in-universe trivia such as random ship names; plopping this list's information would be a large step in the wrong direction. Full disclosure: I did the initial prod on this list, and have done most of the weed-whacking at Star Destroyer. --EEMeltonIV 02:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete completely in universe content with no real world coverage.  Corpx 05:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested by Nyttend. I respect that Star Wars has a mass following, but no reason that this list (drawn mainly from novels, not the films) needs to exist on its own.  Mandsford 17:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - unencyclopedic.--Amadscientist 04:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there any reason not to transwiki this to Wookieepedia? Why destroy the good-faith effort of several Star Wars fans if it can be just as easily moved to a more appropriate GFDL-licensed wiki? DHowell 01:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe send to Wookieepedia.It does not belong here. None of the content in this list asserts real-world impact or notability. -- SECisek 19:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.