Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Wars superweapons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

List of Star Wars superweapons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unsourced WP:CRUFT - the fact that this has lasted 5 years since its PROD without a source added kind of speaks for itself. Ansh666 01:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete- The only super weapon that is notable is the Death Star, and it has an article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  02:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  02:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  02:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete agreed, the only notable one is the Death Star, and that's covered elsewhere. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Wookiepedia might be a better fit for this Gmkeros (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely unsourced. Not worth reworking.  Death Star already has article, as does the sourced list of Star Wars weapons.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Not sure of the target, but should probably be merged somewhere, per WP:ATD. While I agree there is little hope of any of these is individually notable, it's also true that each can be sourced to primary sources, meeting V, and thus mergeable to an article that wouldn't have to rely exclusively on such primary sources. I also agree with Gmkeros' unbolded suggestion that if this is to be deleted Transwikiing it first is appropriate. Jclemens (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant and unsourced. Agree with Gmkeros and Jclemens re transwiki.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wookieepedia is the site that'd be the right place for this type of stuff. Pretty much only the Death Star is notable.  Zappa  O  Mati   03:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete since this list does not meet Wikipedia's standards for writing about fiction, and I cannot seem to find coverage from reliable sources that discusses this particular grouping. However, I would be fine with a brief mention elsewhere. Perhaps as part of a more general section at superweapon about such superweapons in fiction? Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not that this AFD needs anymore delete !votes, but much of the article seems to be WP:OR or fancruft that has not been covered by reliable sources. Mkdw talk 06:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.