Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Steam Early Access games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

List of Steam Early Access games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

User:Jakevossen5 said this is a bad idea. Unsurprisingly nobody is maintaining this unmaintainable, ever-growing list of 3000+ games (according to the external link) for the past few years. Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Vaypertrail (talk) 02:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: The usage of the external link in this nomination statement could easily mislead a reader into misinterpreting the statement as meaning that the article itself is an unmaintainable ever-growing list of 3000+ games, which nobody is maintaining. When, in fact, the number of entries in the article are a fraction of that amount. Also, it's unclear which list the nominator asserts is not being maintained, the one in the article, or the one located at the external link. Huggums537 (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Unanimous references by variants of a single source. Ajf773 (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- unmaintainable, and fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE (with a touch of WP:SPAM and WP:NOTNEWS thrown in there as well). Reyk  YO!  09:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a pity you didn't have a WP:PINCH, or a WP:SPRINKLE of something else to WP:TOSS in there also... Heh heh. Huggums537 (talk) 00:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete in the name of the Cynical Fleet per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow delete – Very hard to maintain; fails these two sections of NOT principly, not to mention failing other guidelines or policies. A classic case of listcruft. Even if Wikipedia's guidelines were all made by me—a person who sets a very low bar in principle for lists—would dismiss this.  J 947 ( c ) (m)   05:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.