Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Strogg in Quake 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 16:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

List of Strogg in Quake 4
IMO: not encyclopaedic. Reads like it came straight out of a game manual, and no attempt is made at an "out of game world" perspective. Interesting only to players of the game. Been tagged for claenup for December 2005, Wikification since January 2006, and yet it is still a mess. I know there are other articles like this, and I will seek them out for deletion too, so please do not use that as a "keep" reason. Batmanand | Talk 14:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: just because it's only interesting to players of the game doesn't mean it doesn't deserve an article. And yes, I am going to use the fact that there are other good articles like this for a reason.--Zxcvbnm 14:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge: Per ReptileLawyer.
 * Delete: These are minor characters and could be integrated into the main article. Deletion policy/Minor characters. --ReptileLawyer 15:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Surely this means your vote is to merge? --Oldak Quill 22:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep While they are minor characters, this is a large list, which is exactly the provision given in the above guideline for information having its own page. --InShaneee 18:10, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as the other voters seem to be recommending. --InShaneee 19:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The list is not as large as some others, and could easily be integrated into Quake 4.--Zxcvbnm 19:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.