Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Super Bowl winning head coaches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. After checking, I noticed that everything in this article was already in the other article, and as a result there's no need to merge. Wizardman 21:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

List of Super Bowl winning head coaches

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

We already have List of Super Bowl head coaches Buc (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Buc. -- JulesN   Talk  08:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I created the article that is being deleted, and so take this with a grain of salt. I do think both articles have useful information, and there should be a way to combine them, but I'm not the best at integrating articles.  Most importantly, the succession box in each head coaches' page needs to be updated.  I started the article mostly because there was no "coach page" of any kind being linked to the succession box...it went directly to the "Super Bowl" article, which seems silly.  I understand if you all want to delete the page, but frankly, this list of winning coaches seems to have more information and have better formatting than the general "list of coaches" page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jairuscobb (talk • contribs) 09:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.   -- Iain99Balderdash and piffle 09:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge the "Coaches with multiple Super Bowl wins" list into List of Super Bowl head coaches, it's useful information to preserve. --Rividian (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per Rividian.  K C  109  15:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC).
 * Merge per Rividian. There's no real reason to delete it; it's useful information, it just isn't in the right place.  Celarnor Talk to me  21:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per all three above. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 14:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Thanks everyone. Jairuscobb (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.