Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Super Mario 64 glitches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

List of Super Mario 64 glitches

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable trivia. Also does not cite a single source. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 17:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 17:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 17:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unnecessary spin out. Most if not all content would fail WP:GAMECRUFT or not be able to be reliably sourced. Anything else (if there's anything at all) can just be put in the parent article. Sergecross73   msg me  17:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is not Gamespot or IGN.. per WP:NOTGUIDE WP is not a depository of game guides. There are a lot of websites where this information can be found, but WP is not one. Being unsourced and unlikely to have RS is another issue, but even if NYT wrote an article on it, NOTGUIDE is controlling. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  18:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Purely an original research essay Dexxtrall (talk) 19:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 19:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the nom. Pahiy (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fancruft. While there is an argument that the backwards long jump is notable enough to have its own page, everything else on the list is not. Mlb96 (talk) 05:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:LISTN, one criteria for a list being notable is if it has been discussed as a set by independent, reliable sources. The only source I can find doing so is this, and I am not confident about its reliability. BilledMammal (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Citations have been added, the page has been categorised, and there are other lists of such glitches online, such as . I may also suggest merging it with Super Mario 64. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mngoblin (talk • contribs) 11:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Struck duplicate vote as user has voted again below. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 20:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Theres still multiple glaring issues here, including WP:GAMECRUFT (material not appropriate for Wikipedia), the fact that there's not enough content to warrant a split off article, and virtually ever source in the article is not considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Sergecross73   msg me  13:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fair enough, go for it. Just thought I'd give page making a shot. I'll wait until I know more about the rules before trying again. Comment added by Mngoblin (talk
 * Delete per WP:VGSCOPE. The content belongs to Fandom, Super Mario Wiki, and other similar projects.  Wario-Man  talk 02:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a directory of technical errors that appear in video games or other media. Ajf773 (talk) 09:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.