Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Superstars to Hold the WWE & World Heavyweight Championships


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. Jaranda wat's sup 20:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Superstars to Hold the WWE &amp; World Heavyweight Championships

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This along with four other pages are just lists, not needed. Darrenhusted 12:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions.

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all just lists like the page above:


 * Delete the top one. Be bold and do the following redirects:
 * Redirect List of top World Heavyweight Champions by combined length. to List of World Heavyweight Championship (WWE) reigns by length.
 * Redirect List of top ECW World Champions by combined length to List of ECW World Championship reigns by length.
 * Redirect List of top WWE Intercontinental Champions by combined length to List of WWE Intercontinental Championship reigns by length.
 * Redirect List of top WWE United States Champions by combined length. to List of WWE United States Championship reigns by length. Lugnuts 12:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

*Delete I can't even tell what any of them even contribute to anything. It looks more like something fitting for a plaque on a wall than in an encyclopedia. NobutoraTakeda 21:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC) This user is banned for disruption and sockpuppetry, and his vote has been stricken. 
 * Comment, I think that a redirect is unlikely to ever be needed as the titles are so long. Darrenhusted 17:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. Davnel03 15:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete them all, It doesn't make sense to redirect them because no other articles link there. Nikki311 17:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all They are just recreated lists of redirected pages. The same info is already on the List of reigns by length pages.-- bullet proof  3:16 17:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nn indiscriminate info, and there's still plenty more of these "combined length" or "longest reign" pages that have no place here either. Biggspowd 00:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * KEEP these articles are always commenting on who's held both titles. And now when someone finally creates an article for it you want to delete it. Does that make sense to you?-- Hornet man  16  02:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment at the risk of getting in to a 35k argument, have you looked at all the articles? They duplicate information available elsewhere, and the list of who have held both titles is replicating the information on each of those wrestlers bios, and none of them have an intro or any references. They are just lists which duplicate lists. Darrenhusted 11:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.