Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TNA X Division Champions by age


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   11:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

List of TNA X Division Champions by age
Originally tagged as a speedy, but this isn't quite a candidate. It is however, quite non-notable. – ClockworkSoul 02:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This information can already be found in the parent article. It seems unnecessary to have an article sorting the title holders by age. —  NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 04:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 04:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It is interesting, and this type of list exists for other titles as well. TJ Spyke 04:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha, TNA. I'm sorry... Delete per NMChico24. &mdash; riana_dzasta &bull; t &bull; c &bull; e  &bull; ER &bull; 09:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Redundant. StuffOfInterest 13:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Also protect the page (if it does get deleted). I remember seeing this page before August 2 (when it was started), and it got deleted then too. RobJ1981 18:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete other wrestling pages don't have this and only the oldest/youngest parts really matter. --- Lid 21:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Edit: actually some other pages do have this, though I don't see why. --- Lid 21:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't seem that notable to me, but if there are other lists like this then post links and I might change my vote, though I think I agree with Lid that only the oldest/youngest are really relevant (and that is on the title's entry, presumably) -- Davetron5000 21:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * List of WWE world champions by age and List of ECW World Heavyweight Champions by age. TJ Spyke 21:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, those are also scheduled for deletion. Wouldn't it be simpler to just put a birthdate or age column in the table on the championship's entry ypage? -- Davetron5000 14:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as redundant. &mdash; Khoikhoi 22:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it redunant? This is the only page where all the champions are listed rather than just the oldest and youngest. TJ Spyke 22:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I think all the age articles should be removed. What's the point of useless trivia? I can understand list of champions by length, because that's somewhat notable.. But age? Give me a break. What's next, champions by height? weight? It's redundant because there is lists of champions already, and there doesn't need to be a near identical list (with the exception of some small detail like age). RobJ1981 23:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Why not? It's a solid categorisation. King fish erswift  10:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. BlueValour 04:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.