Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taiwanese animation studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Taiwanese animation. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

List of Taiwanese animation studios

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Forty-six entries, of which 44 are redlinks. I submit it is unlikely that the majority, or even a sizable percentage, of these will have an article any time soon; and in any case, the list currently runs counter to WP:CSC (no creation/"to-do" lists). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. 2 blue links out of 44 with no references of any sort (other than official website WP:NOTLINKFARM) does not make a suitable list. Ajf773 (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have since nominated an article linked from this one for deletion: Articles for deletion/List of Taiwanese animations — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajf773 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Taiwanese animation (with the history preserved under the redirect) in lieu of deletion. Preserving the history is useful so that editors can do a selective merge to Taiwanese animation of any material that can be sourced. A concern about this list is that it is unclear which of the animation studios are notable and which are not since all but two are red links. And all of the entries are unsourced. If each entry could be sourced with reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the studio, that would establish the studio is notable, and in my view would be sufficient to undo the redirect and restore the list. Cunard (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.