Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Telugu songs recorded by Sujatha Mohan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

List of Telugu songs recorded by Sujatha Mohan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NLIST. Note that WP:NOTDATABASE applies. Few, if any, tracks pass WP:NMUSIC. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Lists,  and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sujatha Mohan. Fails WP:NLIST per nom. Part of the list can be covered there. SBKSPP (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect as per SBKSPP, fails NLIST and WP:VERIFY. Onel 5969  TT me 21:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - the listing is nowhere an "indiscriminate collection of information". Could only be relevant if WP decided that no list of recorded songs could have a place here. Similar articles do exist with even poorer sourcing. Otherwise it just needs expansion and proper sourcing, not deletion. Most of the films already have enough references and the songs may be traced upon searching on the web. Abbasulu (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * I agree with Abbasulu that this is not an indiscriminate collection of information. And it probably does not violate NLIST, as lists of songs recorded by X are typically fine.  Nor is the reference to NMUSIC in the nom relevant to whether the list is appropriate.  But as long as it is unsourced, I cannot verify that this list meets NLIST and I cannot !vote to keep given that as it stands it fails WP:V. Rlendog (talk) 15:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the reasoning in the nomination. I appreciate that "redirects are cheap", but this doesn't seem to be a useful search term. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.