Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thai anniversaries celebrated in association with UNESCO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not convinced this subject merits its own inclusion on Wikipedia. Missvain (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

List of Thai anniversaries celebrated in association with UNESCO

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable list for which no independent sources can be found other than UNESCO 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: These UNESCO anniversaries are seen as a big deal in Thailand, where they regularly become news items. See e.g. coverage in the Bangkok Post. That said, if we're going to carry a list on the topic, it probably shouldn't be limited to Thailand. I've actually had a userspace draft lying around for some time, but honestly haven't been able to identify independent sources that are about the programme itself. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:54, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: The UNESCO references should be fine in this case since it's a list not an article, and all entries in the list have their own (notable) article. The Thai version of the article does have several references at the end, unlike the English version. Dr. Universe (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * According to Stand-alone lists, "Being articles, stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies, such as verifiability, no original research, neutral point of view, and what Wikipedia is not, as well as the notability guidelines." so we need multiple independent reliable source to establish notability. The items seem like hoaxes to me. What is celebrated is the 100th birthday of Damrong Rajanubhab not himself! So items are not notable either. The Thai article is out of discussion. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.