Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thai people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

List of Thai people

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Since this list is neither annotated nor sorted and without inclusion criteria, it seems pretty much useless as it stands. There is a category which does this better. Paul_012 (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unnecessary list. Joe Chill (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep As part of the wider scheme Category:Lists of people by nationality. What policy does the nominator think this violates? As this nomination stands, it should be closed as no real reason has been given for deletion. "without inclusion criteria" - the title of the list gives the clear inclusion criteria! And the arguement "a category which does this better" fails WP:CLN.  Lugnuts  (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is a List of English people so why not Thais? Szzuk (talk) 19:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Really does need some work, before it get too big to be an easy job, but its allowed via WP:CLN Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 02:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I am gonna start putting descriptions to names tonight .Done. Sorting can come after that .Done but needs improvement. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 02:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm satisfied that this list is appropriate per WP:CLN, as long as the entries are annotated (and preferably sorted by category), and as long as the entries correspond to existing articles (not redlinks).  I trust Exit2DOS will keep up with the improvements.   Rich wales (talk · contribs) 03:15, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. Per all the above keeps.  (And the test is never whether an article is "necessary").--Epeefleche (talk) 02:15, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.