Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Beautiful Life : TBL episodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Beautiful Life: TBL . (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

List of The Beautiful Life : TBL episodes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:CRYSTAL at the mo - we know two episode dates, of which one only even has a confirmed title. The series does not even start until mid-september. Ironholds (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * In addition: 1) a list with two items isn't really worth its own page, 2) we don't have enough information on the matter to justify an individual article/list. Ironholds (talk) 02:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Invalid deletion rationale.  WP:CRYSTAL is not applicable here.  Merely stating that a TV series will start next month is not unverifiable speculation.  Deliberations if the series would be a success or failure or whatever would fall under CRYSTAL.  I have no idea of what this show is about, but the info seems to be verifiable at IMDb  - this was the 2nd Google |hit!  I think what you're really saying is that you don't' think it's notable, but that's a different issue.  The right action would be to fact tag it and merge it to The Beautiful Life: TBL instead of overburdening the AfD circuit. (refactored text) What about userfying it? Power.corrupts (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Right, thanks for shitting on my motives and inferring things there. Expanded the rationale somewhat. You seem to be ignoring the fact that IMDB is not considered a reliable source. See that button marked "add episode", yes? And that invitation to add content? Well that makes it a user-contributed project, not sure if you're familiar with those, meaning info can be added by any bozo. Ironholds (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry if the wording was overly harsh, it was late. I agree that the content is very thin, but there are other options than defaulting to delete. Power.corrupts (talk) 08:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the tone of my reply as well - similar reasoning really, I'd been awake for 22 hours at that point. Ironholds (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect until such time as reliable sources (not IMDB) confirm this. Probably the simplest way to resolve this until it's unabigously inclusion-worthy? Jclemens (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Easy merge/redirect, probably until the whole first season airs. Else why split it at all? Nosleep  break my slumber 03:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.