Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Daily Show contributor appearances


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was October 26 2006...Live from the Wikipedia Headquarters, this is the AfD and delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

List of The Daily Show contributor appearances
Original research. Cruft on top of cruft. No sources. Fagstein 07:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh for the love of God! Nuke it from orbit: kill it as original research, and if it's tied to a specific source, kill it as being utterly redundant. But kill it before it metastasizes. --Calton | Talk 08:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with you, but there might be better ways phrase AfD !votes in the future. - Lex 16:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non encyclopedic fan obsession --Dweller 08:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - pointless fancruft. BTLizard 09:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 09:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 11:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Cruftcruft.-- Hús  ö  nd  12:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Ugh. --MonkBirdDuke 13:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Daily Show cruft. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 14:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. --Charlene.fic 15:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful info.Gobawoo 16:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, please. It gave me a headache just looking at it.  No one will learn anything from this garbage, and besides that, it's garbage.OfficeGirl 21:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Appears to be an article of trivia with no encyclopedic value of any kind. --tgheretford (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Love the show but this doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Dimitrii 16:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that this article isn't encyclopedic. - Lex 16:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.