Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Daily Show correspondent titles (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. -  Daniel Bryant  10:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

List of The Daily Show correspondent titles

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - this is the third AFD for this article. The first closed with a delete but got overturned because people who didn't feel like they got a chance to participate wanted their say, and was kept the second time with no consensus. The previous AFDs are linked on the talk page. This article amounts to "collection of trivial one-liners used once on a popular show." It is not encyclopedic. The topic is covered, including examples, in The Daily Show so there is no need to merge this content anywhere. Otto4711 15:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 04:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Deleteper WP:NOT. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 17:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Deleteper nom.  Gan fon  17:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft - just an indiscriminate list, and not encyclopaedic. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  20:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and I'd like to thank the fans of the Daily Show for hosting the rest of Wikipedia here on their fan site for such a long time. Noroton 00:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The AfD notice on the article page was linked to the closed 2nd nomination. I have just fixed it to link to this one. -- Hawaiian717 19:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I thought I had fixed it. Otto4711 20:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete As much as I love The Daily Show, I've always despised this idiotic "article". As unencyclopedic as can be. -- Kicking222 20:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, beautiful example of fancruft. Recury 14:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, per Mr.Z-man, per WP:NOT, per Recury and per sheer common sense. Noroton 21:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. This belongs on a fansite, not in an encyclopedia. -Big Smooth 22:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. big fan of the show, but this does not belong on WP. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 14:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.