Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Fairly OddParents DVD and VHS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

List of The Fairly OddParents DVD and VHS

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:SPAM WP:NOT This is product catalog information. Wikipedia isn't a shopping site. John Nagle (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The information could use some sourcing and better information, but it isn't advertising, and it isn't really a catalog. BOVINEBOY 2008 ) 08:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (by nominator, so only one vote) We already have The Fairly OddParents, so this is a spinoff article. The products themselves are not notable. This is the sort of info that belongs on a shopping site, which Wikipedia is not. --John Nagle (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps it isn't advertising and perhaps it isn't really a catalog, but it's also fair to say that it isn't adding anything to the wealth of human knowledge. I'm sure that this would be welcome over here.  Mandsford (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm voting for deletion, though I do have a comment to make, part of the page, but not too much could be moved into the Fairly OddParents under a new section as 'DVD Releases' or something like that. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as this list has no verifiable definition in accordance with WP:Source list, without which it is just a collection of loosely assoicated of topics without any externally validated rationale for inclusion in Wikipedia. A verifable definition is also needed to demonstrate that it is not the product of original research. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 22:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.