Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Price Is Right pricing games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

List of The Price Is Right pricing games

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Duplication of information found within Template:Active Pricing Games. Includes no additional detail about pricing games that isn't already discussed within the show's main article Sottolacqua (talk) 19:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have no opinion on the actual content, but like the nominator's other AFD, the reason for deletion basically goes against WP:CLN: "Developers of these redundant systems [categories, lists, and navigation templates] should not compete against each other in a destructive manner, such as by nominating the work of their competitors to be deleted just because they overlap. Doing so may disrupt browsing by users who prefer the list system..." Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  —Sarilox (talk) 03:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Because I'd argue that the actual pricing game articles are not sufficiently notable on their own to really be their own articles, and thus can be merged to this to actually make a potentially Featured List. --M ASEM (t) 04:01, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Zzyzx11. This is clearly a aub-article of The Price Is Right (U.S. game show). Per WP:CLN, categories, lists and navigational templates complement each other. Informational redundancy between them is not a reason for deletion. --Pixelface (talk) 19:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the same rationale I made at Articles for deletion/List of retired The Price Is Right pricing games. MuZemike 16:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.