Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2014)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A redirect is an editorial choice at this point forward as I will not supervote it in considering the lack of consensus regarding anything except a delete at this point in time. Mkdw talk 01:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2014)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While it is confirmed that Jimmy Fallon will take over as the host of The Tonight Show early next year, I think that this article is too premature have online at this time. A case of WP:TOOSOON. And Adoil Descended (talk) 17:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This is obvious and should've just been redirected.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 21:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is a reason we don't have List of human settlements on Mars and Forbes list of trillionaires. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete All of these List of talk show episodes articles always end up deleted because a daily talk show just doesn't work well at all as an article. It's information only of interest to a select few, and yes, way too soon.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I closed this as the article had been redirected by its creator (and as Taylor also suggested), but the closure and obvious redirect were reverted by the nominator. Ansh666 21:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply The non-admin closure was inappropriate and the decision to redirect the article was a unilateral decision that ignored the growing consensus of this discussion. I would ask both the article's creator and the would-be closer to please respect the views of their peers and allow this discussion to run its full course. Thank you. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * See my talk for reply. Ansh666 21:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I would request that this AfD be closed by an admin. Thank you. And Adoil Descended (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The snow here is quite deep. No one is contesting deleting the "article" (really just a bunch of formatting) and no one is contesting a redirect (not a tremendously useful one, of course, but no damage whatsoever in having it). I cannot begin to imagine what we hope to accomplish here by discussing this further. The horse is quite dead and all indications are that our continued whipping of it is merely deification of process. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 05:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.