Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Waodani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Nakon  04:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

List of The Waodani

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Long list of non-notable people. Operation Auca sufficiently covers this. Corvus cornix talk  03:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep I think the sources provided sadisfy notability for the group, they do not "deserve" an article each, but grouped together like theyare should be fine. Yes Operation Auca covers similar info to an extent, but this is much more detailed and seems to be well written. I remember reading Through Gates of Splendor when I was younger and the stories seem to check out. Fosnez (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This article provides valuable background info for the one on Operation Auca. Maybe the 2 should be merged. But it would be too bad if this info was lost. 83.202.12.125 (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely uninteresting. All these persons are non notable. If we keep it, I want my name on wikipedia because I am a member of diverse communities much more famous than the Waodani. Poppy (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep - "uninteresting" is irrelevant. And don't you know how to find the list of all Wikipedians? Wryspy (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 18:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep since it appears to be helpful in further understanding Operation Auca, a significant subject and featured article. Noroton (talk) 05:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.