Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thomas & Friends rolling stock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

List of Thomas & Friends rolling stock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find no indication that the topic of rolling stock in Thomas & Friends has ever been discussed as unit in depth in reliable sources, so I see no indication that this article could ever pass WP:LISTN. As this content is unsourced at the time of writing this, a merge is also out of the question. Hog Farm Bacon 18:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 18:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 18:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 18:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 18:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. See also List of Thomas & Friends railway engines, List of Thomas & Friends narrow-gauge engines, List of Thomas & Friends non-rail vehicles, and List of people and animals from Thomas & Friends. Classic WP:FANCRUFT. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 19:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fan wiki content not backed by any reliable sources. TTN (talk) 02:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This page is better suited for a Thomas & Friends fan wiki than here.TH1980 (talk) 03:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoot! Hoot! All aboard! Per the above.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 06:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete We are still being weighted down by the sins of pre-2010 indiscriminate creation of articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT. The list is clearly trivial. desmay (talk) 04:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Is Fancruft. Fails WP:LISTN. Is WP:OR  // Timothy ::  talk  03:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete even though Fancruft is an essay, I will invoke it here. WP:LISTN criteria not met. Lightburst (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: My heart says no, but head says yes. Completely OR.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   07:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.