Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ThunderClan cats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

List of ThunderClan cats

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD. Another obscure corner of the encyclopedia where fictional content has been allowed to bloom unchecked. Purely in-universe and sourced entirely to primary sources, there is no realistic possibility of this content being repurposed in a manner befitting an encyclopedia. It appears that there is a warriors, which would be a vastly better home for this content (and the editors responsible), so in the event that this is deleted provisions should obviously be made for a transwiki if requested. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Transwiki We don't need to keep every tiny detail of every notable fictional work (see WP:PLOTSUM etc). If something is of massive cultural or pop-cultural importance, like Hamlet or The Simpsons, it makes sense to have more detail, but that's not the case here. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Transwiki per above. OSborn arfcontribs. 21:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Depends. Would we do the same for all the other lists of cats in various Clans? Brambleberry of RiverClan Chat ♠ Watch 23:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That's the plan. Once this has closed, and assuming the decision is to delete / transwiki, I'll compile a list of similar article in this domain and do a mass-nomination. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an obvious delete (not even a redirect, as I can't imagine this is a likely search term). There's no independent notability for the various clans of this book series. I can see including a page on Hogwarts or the like, but, not that's an exception to the rule.
 * Delete This has been transwikied in the past to Warriors Wikia. This information is already included in all of our individual character articles. It serves no valuable purpose on Wikipedia and includes a number of incredible minor, inconsequential characters. This was found wanting on Wikipedia previously and what is desired here can be accomplished better at Warriors Wikia. Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 15:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I like how as soon as I take a break, all of a sudden, there is just sudden upheaval. Like, when did Kitsufox suddenly come back (I don't mean that in a disparaging way, in case anyone reads that in the wrong inflection)? Anyway, I'm not using this point to try to support a keep, but the problem that's likely to occur once these character pages have been deleted is that fans are going to start piling character descriptions into the main page for characters, or if that's deleted too, there's a chance it'll start piling onto the main series page. Now, I'm not saying that that's a reason to keep (because that would be a logical fallacy), I'm just offering my opinion of the potential effects as I would expect from experience. Seeing as the majority appears so far to support deletion/transwiki, if that's indeed what happens, I'd like to request that the deleting admin also userfy it to my mainspace (you may have to overwrite a bunch of redirects, if I remember correctly).  Bramble  claw  x   18:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, also, there are a bajillion redirects at the moment to the page. seeing as the article is probably going, those redirects need to be dealt with.  Bramble  claw  x   19:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: lack of third party sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.