Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Time-Banks around the World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

List of Time-Banks around the World

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CSC. Currently it is a list of one, which itself is a redlink. It is unlikely most other entries that could be added have articles. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  14:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CSC. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep the article has been improved dramatically since the proposed delectation date. Every day there is some enhancement to look of the data and the content has been built up very quickly and others are trying to help adding more content as well. --Alrawassam (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2014 (UTC),
 * Comment please see the article's talk page. --Alrawassam (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete; poorly-sourced spam-masquerading-as-listcruft; I suspect it's actually a list of timebanks which use a certain software package. (I'm not sure why, but our main articles on timebanking seem to suffered from a lot of timebanking software spam in recent years). bobrayner (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, wp is not a directory. this is an example of a list which should absolutely be published, on a website, but not here.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.