Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Time Crisis characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge all to List of Time Crisis characters. The list is too long as it is to just merge to Time Crisis (series) (and it could likely be immediately resplit due to Summary style). - jc37 07:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Time Crisis characters

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:FICT: No third-party sources anywhere to speak of, lacks real-world notability. It is written entirely in a in-universe style and consists entirely of plot summary. No secondary sources to speak of, so unsalvagable. Prod "contested" by anonymous user. Precdedant includes List of Guild Wars characters]. [[User:Hbdragon88|hbdragon88 (talk) 01:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge: into Time Crisis (series). Just the ones that are actually important to the game.  - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I've never played the console versions, so there might be some more back story to it, but what I literally get from the arcade games is that they're just two progressively prettier faces (due to technology) who have no personality whatsoever. You could call them Agent A and B and their role wouldn't change in the slightest.  They barely speak, and when they do it's a smart remark or something.  Each game has just two whiz-bang aces who are in a time crisis to save the world.
 * Wild Dog has slightly more personality, but again, not much, and nothing of his back story is ever revealed either. He's just the big bad guy who is a pain to take down and appears in every game. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - per Rjd.   jj137  ( Talk ) 03:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - This might be useful for us on . Unfortunately, I don't have the knowledge of the game to be able to properly split them up. Any help would be appreciated (please leave a message on my talk page here or there if you're interested). -- Prod-You (talk) 04:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Rjd.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 06:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 12:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Gavin Collins (talk) 13:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge pages into an abbreviated character list. --Lenin and McCarthy |  (Complain here) 01:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as Time Crisis is a notable game series (a new one just came out for the PlayStation 3. If merged, then please redirect without deleting so that if character notability increases we won't have to start the whole article over again.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 00:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTINHERITED. While many reliable third-party sources have written about the Time Crisis games themselves (thus solidifying their encyclopaedic significance) the same is not true of the characters themselves. GarrettTalk 09:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Characters who appear in a major international game series that are recognizable to thousands of people are inherently notable. Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 15:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge anything that's needed to Time Crisis (series), notablility not inherited and none independently established.  Mi re ma re  17:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge -Not notable in itself, notable if part of the series article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Keep the main characters and merge them into their respective games, and delete the rest. 1yodsyo1 16:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.