Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tokyo Revengers characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tokyo Revengers. Since it was a split, there is not a consensus that info requires merging. However the redirect is a valid ATD and the delete !votes don't have a reason not to redirect it. Star  Mississippi  04:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

List of Tokyo Revengers characters

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not enough content to warrant a split from the Tokyo Revengers article. Xexerss (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  15:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. Xexerss (talk) 20:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as bold split, add copied tags on talk pages, remove information from main. Anime official website has a list of 25 characters, so it is likely going to be big. https://tokyo-revengers-anime.com/character/ Fairly long-running series (29 volumes) AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't necessarily oppose to have the article eventually, but, as it currently is, it doesn't seem ready for mainspace. Maybe the list should be expanded in the main article of the series or moved as Draft for the time being. Xexerss (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable fictional characters so this fails WP:LSC and the WP:GNG. The references are about the artists or the actors, not about the characters themselves so notability isn't demonstrated so the references don't go towards notability of the cahracters, and fail WP:LISTVERIFY. This is in-universe fan-base cataloging. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Right now, I don't see any consensus here. It sounds like if this article kept, it still needs a lot of work done on it to get it into shape. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I would keep, but the page as it is needs a lot of work to demonstrate notability if it were to be kept so it can meet WP:GNG. Maybe demote it to a draft so it can be worked on? MushroomMan674 (talk) 01:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 03:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect back to Tokyo Revengers. My BEFORE failed to find RS dealing with characters from that show, so WP:LISTN does not appear to be met. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:12, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Lists of characters should meet a minimum standard of notability, which this article does not seem to meet. Given that it was a split, I see no point in a merge. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zxcvbnm. There aren't any sources about these characters and this fails WP:LISTN. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.