Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Trent Barton bus routes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

List of Trent Barton bus routes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has no sources other than the company website and has been tagged as unreferenced for the last year. There can be no guarantee that the information will be kept updated as changes are frequent. Wikipedia is not a travel guide and people are better getting the most up to date information from the company site. The article fails WP:N, WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTTRAVEL. Charles (talk) 18:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It's just a split-off from the main Trent Barton article because the list was too long to include in it. This is fine the way it is. I do think you are being most terribly vindictive when it comes to bus routes.  Rcsprinter  (chatter)  @ 19:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I have to agree with Charles here on WP:NOTDIR. For me it's just an amalgamation of this paragraph on the Trent Barton page and a list of bus routes on the company's website [//www.trentbarton.co.uk/bus-information/route-list] with intermediary stops. My first port of call would be the company's website if I wanted to find out bus times/routes, not Wikipedia. Funny  Pika! 19:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * For those who do still choose Wikipedia as their source for bus routes, there's List of bus routes in Nottinghamshire and List of bus routes in Derbyshire. Both those pages should cover Trent Barton's bus routes, making this article a rather redundant content fork. Funny  Pika! 20:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  03:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go   Phightins  !  00:06, 6 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is no real reason why it would be useful to anybody, as some have already said, they could more effectively use the company's website. Additionally, I'm not British; but I've never heard of Derbyshire, so it might not meet notably guidelines.  I'm also thinking that it could serve as an unconcious ad to get people to ride the bus there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LM103 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as unencyclopedic. This list only includes current routes, which are no more of encyclopedic interest than past routes (which themselves are not really encyclopedic), and listing by operator isn't really even useful enough to transwiki to Wikivoyage. --Michig (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.