Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Turkish football champions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

List of Turkish football champions

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No source since Feb 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sisman Yanko (talk • contribs) 05:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * keep are you challenging that it is sourceable? have you tried, per WP:BEFORE? (note I have removed a speedy G10 template on the page as a duplicate. ) DGG (alternate account) (talk) 17:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close per DGG. AfD is not for cleanup, this is quite clearly a notable list on a notable topic.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – Article isn't in the best shape at the moment, but the topic itself is worthy of a page in notability terms. Who knows, maybe someday this could be a featured list, like some other similar pages.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 01:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - a list on an obviously notable subject, the lack of sources is not a reason for deleting here. Possibly qualifies as a speedy keep under criterion 2.5. &mdash;BETTIA&mdash; talk 08:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as above. GiantSnowman 18:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as above 20:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Warburton1368 (talk)
 * Keep. An article that needs improving, not deleting. Argyle 4 Life  talk  03:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. If there is a problem with the sources, it can be tagged accordingly. That's no reason to delete the article. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This list is informative enough in its current state, and could be improved further using the models of some other lists in the national football champions category. This also prompts the idea of creating more lists on that topic; maybe I'll go on and create one for the champions of my country. The shortage of sources cited isn't an irresolvable problem, because they can be supplied easily, and even without them the information looks trustworthy. Let's keep this article and deal with its demerits by means of regular editing. --Theurgist (talk) 03:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.