Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UFC Lineal Champions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

List of UFC Lineal Champions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails WP:NOR and the inclusion policy as its only two sources does not say nothing about the subject. The majority of the information in the article is similar to List of UFC champions. LlamaAl (talk) 07:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This is total unsourced original research and unless it can be fully sourced to reliable sources it must be deleted as failing policy. Mt  king (edits) 07:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete – Entirely original research. I also agree with Mtking about not deleting it if reliable sources can be found.  The Anonymouse ( talk  •  contribs ) [ Merry Christmas! ] 07:38, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Delete all the things related to UFC on Wikipedia! But I agree on the WP:OR. Delete this and bookmark http://www.fightmatrix.com/lineal-championship-histories/ instead. Mazter00 (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * comments like this do not help. a lot of users already feel like the MMA debate is being spearheaded as a WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT issue. Consensus needs to be worked on, fanning the flames is counterproductive. Kevlar (talk) 21:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It was on the side, agreed. But I am right. I just read the deletion of UFC 157 (sorry for not linking), and the admin kww (well-known and quite reasonable) just proved, with the help of mtKing, that any and all future UFC events will and shall be deleted on the spot. I can think of exceptions, but that is in line of "force majour" (I probably misspelt that one). It is now 99% guaranteed that future UFC events will be deleted.
 * I tend to not to vote on those AfD because I know the result. With 48 votes, 50% keep votes, that is the biggest AfD debate I've seen regarding UFC events (future). When I jokingly say "Delete all the things related to UFC" I am *not* far away from the truth. Mazter00 (talk) 02:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * please reread kww's comments Articles for deletion/UFC 157. Kevlar (talk) 19:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete It is mostly original research. — ΛΧΣ  21  06:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be WP:OR. --TreyGeek (talk) 21:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.