Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UFO-related entities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  kur  ykh   00:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

List of UFO-related entities

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Should human beings be listed? How about cattle? No obvious standard for inclusion, not list-worthy. See also Articles for deletion/List of alleged UFO-related entities and the previous gem Articles for deletion/List of alleged UFO-related vehicles. ScienceApologist (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Pointless article.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought I was seeing double there for a minute. So the other article is alleged encounters and this one is confirmed? Sadly there wasn't anything notable or substantive in this article. And its very compilation is an excercise in original research. Big Foot is UFO related? Not worth keeping. I'm surprised it wasn't speedied. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  __meco (talk) 10:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - indiscriminate and unverifiable. AlexTiefling (talk) 10:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and AT above. Verbal   chat  10:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete They left out He, She, It, Them, The Blob, The Thing from Another World, and The Brain from Planet Arous. Mangoe (talk) 11:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into the list of alleged UFO-related entities. Abyssal (talk) 12:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Why? This is just a list of Fortean stuff. The only link between most of these and UFOs is common appearance in the pages of the Weekly World News. Mangoe (talk) 15:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge an article that should be deleted outright into another that should be deleted outright? What for? Reyk  YO!  00:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - redundant with our existing, extensive coverage of UFO minutia; original research by synthesis; list criteria (whatever that is) not supported by reliable sources. Tom Harrison Talk 15:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- per WP:IINFO. This isn't just an indiscriminate collection of information, it is an indiscriminate collection of non-information. Reyk  YO! 
 * delete- erm, not very good. They left out all my pets, who clearly should be included. Sticky Parkin 12:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of alleged... etc. which is exactly what they are. As the other article should not and probably will not be deleted, there no problem there. DGG' (talk) 15:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.