Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UIL track and field records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 14:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

List of UIL track and field records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:LISTN and WP:GNG. LISTN describes notability for these sorts of lists as "if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". The sources for this rely on one, related website which fails per WP:ROUTINE. My WP:BEFORE search showed as much. There might be local coverage of individual races, but this subject isn't notable, nor does it list notable subjects. Without broader reportage, GNG cannot apply. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 14:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 14:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Also this is a massive WP:NOR fail. These aren't a collection of records, they're a list of links to previous T&F meets where no faster time could be found - all the references refers to content from a single website. I just clicked on an 800m record link and the competitors name isn't even there, so there is a considerable amount of verification fails as well. Ajf773 (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This article fails WP:GNG and violates WP:NOR. Syndicater (talk) 01:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.