Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of USB-C Power Delivery chargable laptops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

List of USB-C Power Delivery chargable laptops

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has a list of products that support a particular protocol of another product. There are many items in this list, suggesting that feature is not particularly notable or an novel difference-maker among products. I don't think there's encyclopedic value in such a list, so this seems to only serve for promotion of the individual products. Many non-links, so the products themselves often aren't notable. Very few references. This broad list will never be current and will be quite difficult to support. Seems to me it fails WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTCATALOG, and WP:RAWDATA. Mikeblas (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I have not found evidence that this passes our notability guidelines on stand-alone lists; in addition, I think it's too indiscriminate to merge into USB-C. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is promotional content, more or less. It looks like a product catalog. --Wario-Man (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Another 'thing will be standard in five years and this article will be a laughable artifact' LISTN failure. Compare to 1947 if we would have had a "List of devices which come with a BS 1363 plug"; it would have been absurd to keep this list once the standard was fully established.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator and also this list topic would easily qualify for WP:LISTCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 23:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. More references needed Quarterto500 (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.