Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Undefeated horses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

List of Undefeated horses

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-sourced list; original research (violates WP:NOR) mhking (talk) 01:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - list is too small and uninformative. Relevant undefeated horses would likely have their own wiki page.  Mandermagic (talk) 06:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment They do. Poechalkdust (talk) 13:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It might look like original research, but the horses themselves are linked and reference links can be dug up from the linked articles. It's perfectly salvageable. - Mgm|(talk) 09:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've put my money where my mouth is and referenced the list as best I could. We'd need an expert to improve the lead section, though. - Mgm|(talk) 10:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keepp As per Mgm. Nice job of sourcing. Edward321 (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. An interesting list for the benefit of browsers, with clear criteria of inclusion.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.