Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 90


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. I think it's pretty clear what the end result is; let's save the eventual closer (and any bandwagon-jumpers) a bit of work, eh? fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 90
Every case in volume 90 is a red link. This is listcruft. TrackerTV 03:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wasn't there an AfD listing of a similar list of cases a while back? BigHaz 03:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Urgh. On second thoughts, change mine to keep in light of the precedent (I'd strike it out, but can't figure out how to do that quickly). BigHaz 06:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Click "edit this page" to see what I did. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 07:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Cheers. I thought I'd tried that myself, but knowing me I must've stuffed up the syntax somewhere in there. BigHaz 12:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep We just went through this with volume 35 . I have no idea what you know regarding these lists, but there are well over 80 of this type. The consensus last time this was up for debate (about a week ago) was a speedy keep. I'm asking that this nomination be withdrawn, as there is already consensus among the Wikipedia community as well as consensus among WikiProject:U.S. Supreme Court cases that these lists remain the way they are. If you have any further comments, please list them here. --MZMcBride 04:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Articles for deletion/List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 35. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. As I was the last one to nominate a pile of red links, and I withdrew (I knew it would come back to bite me!). SynergeticMaggot 09:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.