Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States federal courthouses in the Eleventh Circuit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) Слава Україні! 11:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

List of United States federal courthouses in the Eleventh Circuit

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This page is a WP:REDUNDANT WP:DUPLICATE of List of United States federal courthouses in Alabama, List of United States federal courthouses in Georgia, and List of United States federal courthouses in Florida by transcluding the tables in these primary lists. It is also a redundant duplicate of List of United States federal courthouses, which also transcludes those. I see no need to have these tables in multiple places like this: anyone seeking courthouses in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is capable of looking at either the Alabama, Georgia, and Florida section of the national list or the Alabama, Georgia, and Florida lists. Moreover, these tables include courthouses used by District Courts (not just the Circuit Court of Appeals) and buildings that no longer exist or are now used for other purposes, so grouping by circuit in addition to state and country is somewhat arbitrary. Reywas92Talk 20:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America. Reywas92Talk 20:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, as article creator. My thinking, very straightforwardly, is that it is conceivable that somone would need to see all the courthouses in the Circuit specifically, and it costs us nothing to have a page where all of these are together. Why make a reader go three different places? Conversely, the single list of all federal courthouses, while useful in its comprehensiveness, is a very long page, and a reader who is specifically only interested in courthouses from one of the eleven Circuits should not need to hunt through the 50+ other states and territories to find this handful. There is no question that United States federal courthouses are notable, both individually and in the aggregate, so I see no case against offering this particular natural grouping of them. BD2412  T 20:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, per BD2412. I would argue that this page is notable enough to keep and would be helpful to Wikipedia users if it was retained. Historyday01 (talk) 15:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - per previous opinions given, I'd say that keeping this article as a narrower option to the main list would be beneficial to the average user. A redirect is also possible if a section for the Eleventh Circuit already exists in List of United States federal courthouses. Kirbanzo  (talk - contribs) 04:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * List of United States federal courthouses is listed alphabetically by state rather than being grouped by circuit. In theory, it could be rearranged the latter way (or in various other ways, like date of admission or date of establishment of the court), but the counterbalance to that would be that it would make it harder for the reader looking to just scroll through the states. BD2412  T 05:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I see. Thanks for pointing that out. Kirbanzo  (talk - contribs) 05:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.