Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Urpney Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

List of Urpney Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page is nothing more than a list of plot devices used in a cartoon. It serves little to no purpose and would not even be necessary in the main article or episode list. Nothing more than fancruft. Steve Farrell (talk) 04:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (That's so bad I'm going to have nightmares about it, just what Zordrak wants.) Clarityfiend (talk) 05:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable topic. Author, copy it quick and post it to a blog or something. This may be the first time I've said "fancruft" in an AfD, but now I've said it.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  06:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks like original research based entirely on primary sources. I suggest making a user copy for User:Cynthia149 as a courtesy in case they return to editing and possibly want to move it to another wiki. Rangoondispenser (talk) 01:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.