Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vevo Certified music videos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

List of Vevo Certified music videos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced fancruft; this is merely a "List of music videos with 100 million views on YouTube and the like". The fact that this is given out by a notable website does not matter in my opinion, it is a non-notable metric. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I created the article following the outcome of a CFD for Category:Vevo Certified songs. There is a mention of the certification within the Vevo article. I agree that the list is merely WP:Fancruft with no real legitimate sourcing of artists/videos that receive this certification. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 22:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Violates WP:NOT and its stepchild, WP:SINGLEVENDOR. It's a sales measure from a single entity measuring only that entity's distribution, neglecting the broader market. There are numerous streaming and download charts that do not have the same inherent bias.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Non important list. List shows no significant aid in navigation to the related articles per WP:L. ///Euro Car  GT  22:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an industry metric, and certainly not a neutral source of information and easily bent towards influence without knowing how they're exactly measured.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a notable award, and it does seem a bit like an advertisement. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.