Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Videos Featured on Toonami Jetstream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Daniel Olsen 03:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Videos Featured on Toonami Jetstream


Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. It's a simple matter to check which videos are on the website. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep First of all, the website is not available to everyone. How would you explain your argument to them?  Secondly, there is no other way to track what videos are featured.  Finally, third, It is relative to the subject. NIVINCo 01:41 EST, 4 November 2006
 * Comment If people can't access the site in the first place, what good does it do to tell them what they're missing? Relevant or not, it doesn't mean it's worthy of inclusion. It's an indiscriminate list and nothing more. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * But it is more, it is the whole essence of Toonami Jetstream. NIVINCo 01:45 EST, 4 November 2006
 * No, the shows are the essence, not your list. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * There are more videos than just the shows. Plus there is the times when Toonami Jetstream changed premieres, the duration of how long a video is featured, etc.  All this information can be found in the list.  It is more than just the videos featured. NIVINCo 01:52 EST, 4 November 2006
 * Delete. WP is not an indiscriminate list of info.  ju66l3r 06:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Kavadi carrier 07:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 07:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sandstein 08:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 12:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft. Moreschi 13:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Metropolitan90 18:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 20:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete fails WP:NOT and WP:OR. Danny Lilithborne 01:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.