Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vogue Paris cover models


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Had I known we had a List of Vogue cover models page I would not have nominated this for deletion. However, the article still needs to be cleaned up. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

List of Vogue Paris cover models

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As with my previous AFD on Vogue cover models, this is not a defining moment of a modelling career (in fact, this article has a section similar to the list already under AfD, though to be fair, it is for Vogue Paris rather than Vogue (note that I have little to no knowledge about the world of fashion). Unlike the other list, there are no sources in this article whatsoever. If there was a page for a list of models that have appeared on Vogue Paris, I could have supported a merge there, but there isn't one (and if there was, it would be difficult to maintain, as it would need updating every month, and it wouldn't work as a category either). Strangely, we don't have a List of Playboy cover models page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Withdrawing per the comments made below. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep While not sourced, it seems easily and obviously verifiable and sourceable by the individual Vogue issues. Vogue Paris covers are also the subject of books, which is evidence of meeting WP:LISTN, and discussed in others , , although not extensively. I see no reasonable deletion rationale.-- cyclopia speak! 13:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's the type of article I'd find very useful. It doesn't have inline citations, but like cyclopia mentioned, the sources are self evident from the text of the article. If I want to verify that Audrey Hepburn graced the cover, the publication as well as the date is right there in the text of the article. It could possibly be overkill to cite at the bottom what is plainly stated in the article. I think it's an obvious keep. Bali88 (talk) 20:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have to agree with Bali, this is an useful article, which collates verifiable information in a very nicely laid out, easily checkable format. Unlike the other AFD, this is actually useful. Mabalu (talk) 11:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.