Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of WWE personnel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 22:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

List of WWE personnel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'd rather a bullet be put in this thing and start fresh than constant arguments. Vjmlhds 21:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Sarcastic support Yes, there's no way this pointy move will cause more arguments. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * No reason to delete provided Disputes happen on Wikipedia, and debates will happen. You simply don't delete articles over a dispute. Since I broke the content off of List of professional wrestlers nearly a decade ago, this article is one of the most edited, most viewed lists in the history of Wikipedia, as it would happen. Unless you provide a valid reason, I don't see a reason why this would be deleted. Regards, — Moe   Epsilon  22:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Withdrawing Nomination - What's the use? Vjmlhds (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * We have a discussion in the talk page and somebody decides to delete the entire article? Keep, of course. I don't see any argument to delete the article. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: A childish dispute between two editors is no reason to delete. Rusted AutoParts 22:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I said I'm 'withdrawing the nomination, so let's put it to bed. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.