Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of WWE world champions by age


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Nandesuka 12:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

List of WWE world champions by age
Delete. Age lists are useless trivia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobJ1981 (talk • contribs) This AfD wasn't properly listed. Listing it now and fixing its nomination. --JoanneB 13:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - please see WP:LIST - I wouldn't be opposed to a merge if someone can find an appropriate target. WilyD 13:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment possibly related to the current discussion on the equivalent list for rival wrestling company TNA. MLA 14:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indiscriminate collection of information. All human beings have nearly infinite attributes, so keeping this list would open the doors for List of WWE world champions by shoe size or List of janitors by cheesecake preference. wikipediatrix 19:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a useful list, I also think the TNA one should be kept. TJ Spyke 22:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it useful? It's useless trivia, that no one outside of wrestling fans will enjoy. Put this on a wrestle wiki, not here. RobJ1981 22:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my opinions in X Division Champions by age. --- Lid 22:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per wikipediatrix and per WP:OR. Show me sources besides birth certificates that deal with this subject matter and I may change my mind. -- Koffieyahoo 01:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Indiscriminate list with no clear usefulness. Should you also have a list by weight? Shoe size? IQ? --Xrblsnggt 02:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep List is accurate and is part of wrestling history. If you delete this why not delete champions by length since that is useless trivia? Where does it end? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.134.94.88 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Trivial, listcruft and fancruft. KleenupKrew 03:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This is listcruft. This is wikipedia, not just a wrestling site. Why does age matter so much? Length lists are somewhat important (I suppose), but not that much better. RobJ1981 02:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete information in articles should be as stable as possible, and we can't be certain that the birthdates are totally correct anyways. I also agree with the points made by wikipediatrix. Burgwerworldz 05:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.