Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wangan Midnight episodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn and a very clear consensus for keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

List of Wangan Midnight episodes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unremarkable list Skitzo (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly a notable manga series. Lets  drink  Tea  23:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Lists of episodes are generally appropriate list topics, and I don't see them being all that hard to source. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. 'Unremarkable' at the moment. This is a work in progress. i posted it up so that others may help. Toenailsin 01:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - according to the nom's logic, all stubs should be deleted. This is obviously not true. Stubs can easily be expanded into a larger article. As Toenailsin said, "This is a work in progress." An unremarkable list is usually not a good reason for deleting an article.  Math Cool  10  Sign here! 02:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy Potentially useful, but not ready for articlespace. The list needs to be verified with sources and tied to an article about the series rather than the manga. - Mgm|(talk) 12:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid and typical spinout list for a notable series. Contra MacGyverMagic, the article its linked to covers both the manga and the anime adaptation, and so is appropriately tied. Verification can be taken care of by copying sources from the main article, and I personally would like to follow policy and assume good faith that this would have been done by the list article creator instead of taking it to AFD a half hour after creation, thus showing that the nominator did not follow WP:BEFORE. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: "unremarkable" = stub, which per policy is not a crime. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Give it time. It's a stub and a manga that have a solide anime adaptation (here a 26 eps series) usually have a spin-out list of episodes. List of episodes is one trademark of the Anime/Manga project. --KrebMarkt 14:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable series, list meets policy. Seems to be Snowing. Dandy Sephy (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep unremarkable nomination 「ダイノ ガイ 千 ？！」(Dinoguy1000) 18:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Being "unremarkable" is not a legtitamate arguement to delete a list. Especally when this list can be developed with an approprate lead and episode summaries. Also, the list has just been spun out from the main article and should be given time to mature. If no one is going to work on the list any furhter, then consider merging it back into the parent article, but it shouldn't be deleted unless the parent article is deleted as well. --Farix (Talk) 18:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment And with some minor work and referencing, we now have a decent lead. --Farix (Talk) 20:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn Skitzo Skitzo's Answer Machine 21:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.