Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Warrior Nun Areala characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Cerejota (talk) 00:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

List of Warrior Nun Areala characters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Total fancruft for a series of only questionable notability. Might belong on an Antarctic Press wikia, but not here. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:ITSCRUFT and WP:Not notable for a highly sourced article such as this is a weak nomination rationale. A search that took all of two seconds shows articles written about the comic in USA Today, the Hartford Courant, the San Antonio Express-News, and 1Up.com of IGN Entertainment.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 22:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep and consider alternatives: 1) If the series is NN (it does, in fact, appear notable) then AfD the series and its list of characters at the same time, since a character list's notability is dependent on the source work of fiction. 2) If there is extra stuff in this article, clean it up in place, or 3) Consider merging the core character content into the main article if that wouldn't create an unbalanced article or one which violated WP:SIZE. Jclemens (talk) 01:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.