Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (UK) ratings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 17:30, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

List of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (UK) ratings

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article filled with WP:IINFO/WP:INDISCRIMINATE/WP:NOT. Only reference does not appear to provide source information for data listed in article.  Sottolacqua  (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is not notable with no sourcing--MLKLewis (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. It appears there is a single source, the BARB viewing figures. I think there may be a problem here. Full access to figures gathered by BARB are a subscription service. Does anyone know of the legal implications in reproducing BARB figures in this manner? If we reproduce all of BARB's figures in articles such as this for every single show, do we risk breaching copyright or similar? Pit-yacker (talk) 23:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * EDIT: A quick scan of BARB's website suggests there may well be problems with using this data. However, I'm don't personally understand the intricacies of different data and its use. Pit-yacker (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as enencyclopedic. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a statistics repository. There is little analysis suitable for an encyclopedia.  Pit-yacker brings up a good point about copyright issues as well, but I believe that accurate reporting of television viewing statistics for every episode is hardly creative enough to present a copyright interest in the United States in light of Feist. RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  18:57, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.