Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Windows Vista topics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, as has been pointed out there is a category that serves this function. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 22:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

List of Windows Vista topics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This manually-managed list is made redundant because of the Windows Vista category. It would have been better if the list were maintained topically, but the hassles of manually managing the list, given the proliferation of Windows Vista related articles far outweighs the benefits. Instead, the automated indexing using categories is a much better alternative, IMO, and has an added advantage of automated (though, pretty limited) sorting. As for the sidebar, the link can directly link to the categories. soum talk 10:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Convert to Category & Delete assuming it hasn't been done yet. There is no sub-sorting within the list to warrent a seperate page for it. A category will do it much better. Turlo Lomon 11:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Everything that might have anything to do with Windows Vista is far too broad for a list. Category:Windows Vista already exists.  A similar list was deleted a couple months ago.  Someguy1221 20:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- OSbornarf 23:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per all of the above due to redundacy with category--JForget 22:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unnecessary due to Category:Windows Vista. Carlosguitar 10:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.