Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Xfce applications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Xfce.  MBisanz  talk 01:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

List of Xfce applications

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Xfce covers all of the contents of this article that are coverable (with "coverable" meaning "has enough published information to write a short description of the application"). flaminglawyer 21:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a duplicate of the information on Xfce. There isn't even here to make a merge worthwhile; the Xfce page has more text than this one does. I suppose a redirect would be possible, but that would probably be too implausible. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge. There are items on this list that are not covered at the main page.  There is no reason they cannot be covered in the main page, so they should be merged there rather than deleted. JulesH (talk) 09:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - consensus on Articles for deletion/Mousepad (software) seems to be that if (as has been suggested) all the individual Xfce app pages are merged into one, the resulting mass of information would be too big to include in Xfce and that this page would be needed. Cynical (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete as a perfect example of WP:LISTCRUFT. This looks like this was created just to have a list. Tavix (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Xfce for now. When the list is bigger with a couple of paragraphs for each application, breaking it out to its own article can be discussed. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.