Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Zatch Bell! Spells


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 00:50, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

List of Zatch Bell! Spells
This is essentially a vast image gallery of unsourced, presumably copyrighted, images with no licence information, combined with one-liner descriptions. This does not appear to be an encyclopedia article in the generally accepted sense. Delete -- The Anome 02:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A pity because a lot of work went into it, but it is just another unencyclopaedic list. Copyvio too no doubt. Moriori 02:12, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files --anetode¹ ² ³ 02:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NOT an image gallery with the images, and as exceedingly overspecific fancruft without the images. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 04:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh good lord no! Delete. Post-haste! -R. fiend 05:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but remove copyvio images.I'm not familiar with whatever is being discussed there, but surely we can delete the images and keep the text? - Mgm|(talk) 08:26, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a list of all the various spells used in the Zatch Bell anime. It's possible one could make a list of the recurring spells in that anime, but this list doesn't offer a useful foundation for that task, and even that list would be bordering on fancruft. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 18:14, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It should also be pointed out that every single (presumably copyvio) image on this page seems to also be used at Zatch Bell! characters, an article with many of the same problems. --Aquillion 01:10, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft... no encyclopedic context.--Isotope23 17:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Foofy 15:33, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.