Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Zoids

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 3 July 2005 17:54 (UTC)

List of Zoids
Non-encyclopedic fan listing of toys. Better suited for a a fan page like the one linked to at the bottom, not here. Really detailed list, but... Found this page when looking at recent vandalism by the likely author of this page in eBay. Chairboy 03:05, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Andrew pmk 03:12, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Why keep? It seems inconsistent based on past vfds. Chairboy 03:26, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. We don't need an entire list, just an article describing them in general, unless they are specific enough to say...to have articles similar in nature to Charizard. -- Natalinasmpf 04:28, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The entry was written on a computer that is a part of an office network – this all entries on said network will come under the same IP address. I’d like to point out that I wasn’t responsible for what happened on the eBay entry.
 * Keep. Pokemon gets its own list, why not Zoids. Either keep all or delete all. -Hmib 05:35, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, encyclopedic. Kappa 07:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Topic doesn't seem popular enough to have an article for each, uh, "zoid", so a list is preferable. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:10, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, just so we don't get somebody trying to make articles for each individual one. --Scimitar 14:31, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's preferable to having individuals articles for all. -- Lochaber 14:42, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Unlink all names and it can be a keep. A single master page is all we need.  Any article on any particular Zoid should be killed and sent to the rendering plant. Geogre 16:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per Scimitar and Lochaber, and unlink as per George.    &mdash; P Ingerson  (talk)  17:28, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Unlink all names sounds fine to me. I like toys as much as the next guy, I'm just not seeing how this is encyclopedic.  There are a handful of detailed 'zoid' pages that this article links to that should maybe be unlinked.
 * Keep with the content rather controled - this shouldn't be seen as a go-ahead to create an article on every single one of these guys. It's a OK show, BTW.  Not my cup of tea, but... humblefool&reg; 22:55, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.